<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1311 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289620</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India in directed the counsel to verify if the comparable uncontrolled price method (CUP) was acknowledged by the Transfer Pricing Officer in later assessment years. The matter was adjourned for four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2020 10:07:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1311 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289620</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India in directed the counsel to verify if the comparable uncontrolled price method (CUP) was acknowledged by the Transfer Pricing Officer in later assessment years. The matter was adjourned for four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>