<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 30 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22939</link>
    <description>Goodwill of a firm was treated as property falling within the Estate Duty Act provisions governing property passing or deemed to pass on death, because the issue was governed by the Supreme Court decision relied on by both sides. On that basis, the value of the goodwill was held includible in the principal value of the estate. The question was answered in the affirmative and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:11:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 30 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22939</link>
      <description>Goodwill of a firm was treated as property falling within the Estate Duty Act provisions governing property passing or deemed to pass on death, because the issue was governed by the Supreme Court decision relied on by both sides. On that basis, the value of the goodwill was held includible in the principal value of the estate. The question was answered in the affirmative and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>