https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397216 The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the National Anti-Profiteering Authority's interim orders under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit the profiteered amount with Consumer Welfare Boards within two months, stayed interest, penalty, and further investigation on other products, as well as DGAP letters, pending further orders. The Court addressed the constitutionality of Section 171 of the CGST Act, the investigation scope, and the validity of relevant rules and notifications. The case outcome involved providing specific directions and suspending further actions until the case's resolution. en-us Thu, 06 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397216 The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the National Anti-Profiteering Authority's interim orders under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit the profiteered amount with Consumer Welfare Boards within two months, stayed interest, penalty, and further investigation on other products, as well as DGAP letters, pending further orders. The Court addressed the constitutionality of Section 171 of the CGST Act, the investigation scope, and the validity of relevant rules and notifications. The case outcome involved providing specific directions and suspending further actions until the case's resolution. Case-Laws GST Thu, 06 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397216