<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 150 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397207</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that no addition under Section 50C was warranted as the declared sale consideration exceeded the DLC rate. Emphasizing that Section 50C&#039;s deeming provisions should not be overextended, the tribunal noted the AO should have consulted the DVO if there was a valuation dispute. The decision was issued on 03/08/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2020 13:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 150 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397207</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that no addition under Section 50C was warranted as the declared sale consideration exceeded the DLC rate. Emphasizing that Section 50C&#039;s deeming provisions should not be overextended, the tribunal noted the AO should have consulted the DVO if there was a valuation dispute. The decision was issued on 03/08/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>