<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 146 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397203</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s deletion of additions and disallowances made by the AO, citing lack of concrete evidence and independent verification. Additionally, the Tribunal invalidated the reassessment due to vague reasons and absence of specific allegations, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 146 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397203</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s deletion of additions and disallowances made by the AO, citing lack of concrete evidence and independent verification. Additionally, the Tribunal invalidated the reassessment due to vague reasons and absence of specific allegations, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>