<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 139 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397196</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent authorities to conduct provisional assessments of the imported goods, &quot;Dry Dates,&quot; against a specific bill of entry within two weeks, ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations. The judgment disposed of the writ petition with this directive, focusing on the urgency of the provisional assessment rather than explicitly addressing the release of seized goods or the grant of costs requested by the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2020 10:51:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 139 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397196</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent authorities to conduct provisional assessments of the imported goods, &quot;Dry Dates,&quot; against a specific bill of entry within two weeks, ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations. The judgment disposed of the writ petition with this directive, focusing on the urgency of the provisional assessment rather than explicitly addressing the release of seized goods or the grant of costs requested by the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>