<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1520 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289604</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the AO&#039;s decision to disallow the Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) exemption under Section 10(38) for the assessee, citing a violation of natural justice principles. The Tribunal noted that the AO&#039;s reliance on third-party statements without allowing cross-examination was unjust. The order was deemed legally infirm, and the appeal for the assessment year 2014-2015 was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2020 09:57:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1520 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289604</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the AO&#039;s decision to disallow the Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) exemption under Section 10(38) for the assessee, citing a violation of natural justice principles. The Tribunal noted that the AO&#039;s reliance on third-party statements without allowing cross-examination was unjust. The order was deemed legally infirm, and the appeal for the assessment year 2014-2015 was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>