<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (7) TMI 57 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289593</link>
    <description>Parliament had legislative competence to enact the Gift-tax Act as applied to gifts of agricultural land because the levy was treated as a tax on the transaction of gift, not a tax on land itself. The power to legislate on agricultural land or on taxes on lands and buildings did not extend to imposing gift-tax on transfers of such land, and taxation was treated as a distinct field from the substantive subject. The measure therefore did not fall within Entry 49 of List II, and Parliament&#039;s authority was upheld under the residuary power in Article 248 and Entry 97 of List I. The challenge to validity failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 17:11:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (7) TMI 57 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289593</link>
      <description>Parliament had legislative competence to enact the Gift-tax Act as applied to gifts of agricultural land because the levy was treated as a tax on the transaction of gift, not a tax on land itself. The power to legislate on agricultural land or on taxes on lands and buildings did not extend to imposing gift-tax on transfers of such land, and taxation was treated as a distinct field from the substantive subject. The measure therefore did not fall within Entry 49 of List II, and Parliament&#039;s authority was upheld under the residuary power in Article 248 and Entry 97 of List I. The challenge to validity failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>