<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1944 (6) TMI 14 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289588</link>
    <description>Agricultural land was construed broadly to include land actually used for cultivation and land used as a necessary accessory to agriculture, such as tanks, homesteads of cultivators, pathways, khals, nullahs, gardens and orchards where the evidence supported that character. The widow&#039;s claim under the Hindu Women&#039;s Rights to Property Act, 1937 was confined to non-agricultural property, because agricultural land fell outside that enactment. The court also recognised that a co-sharer may obtain separate allotment in partition by metes and bounds in the same proceeding where the property is capable of practical division, and the decree was modified accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 14:58:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1944 (6) TMI 14 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289588</link>
      <description>Agricultural land was construed broadly to include land actually used for cultivation and land used as a necessary accessory to agriculture, such as tanks, homesteads of cultivators, pathways, khals, nullahs, gardens and orchards where the evidence supported that character. The widow&#039;s claim under the Hindu Women&#039;s Rights to Property Act, 1937 was confined to non-agricultural property, because agricultural land fell outside that enactment. The court also recognised that a co-sharer may obtain separate allotment in partition by metes and bounds in the same proceeding where the property is capable of practical division, and the decree was modified accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>