<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1939 (8) TMI 34 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289585</link>
    <description>Section 96(1) authorises a search warrant only for an inquiry, trial or other proceeding under the Code, and not merely to aid police or customs investigation. The provision may operate before formal proceedings begin if the warrant is genuinely needed for an inquiry about to be made, but that condition was not met here because the warrant was issued to assist investigation. The Court also required independent judicial satisfaction on adequate material; reliance on a bare police statement, without examining the informant or assessing necessity and alternatives, was insufficient. The warrant was therefore unlawful, and the seized documents were ordered to be returned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1939 (8) TMI 34 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289585</link>
      <description>Section 96(1) authorises a search warrant only for an inquiry, trial or other proceeding under the Code, and not merely to aid police or customs investigation. The provision may operate before formal proceedings begin if the warrant is genuinely needed for an inquiry about to be made, but that condition was not met here because the warrant was issued to assist investigation. The Court also required independent judicial satisfaction on adequate material; reliance on a bare police statement, without examining the informant or assessing necessity and alternatives, was insufficient. The warrant was therefore unlawful, and the seized documents were ordered to be returned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>