https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289577 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that the Revenue failed to substantiate its allegations with tangible evidence. The appeal filed by the Appellant was allowed, and the penalties and confiscation orders were annulled. The Tribunal's decision underscored the importance of concrete evidence in proving charges of clandestine removal and highlighted the inadequacies in the Revenue's investigation and adjudication process. en-us Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:50:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289577 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that the Revenue failed to substantiate its allegations with tangible evidence. The appeal filed by the Appellant was allowed, and the penalties and confiscation orders were annulled. The Tribunal's decision underscored the importance of concrete evidence in proving charges of clandestine removal and highlighted the inadequacies in the Revenue's investigation and adjudication process. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289577