<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 116 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22920</link>
    <description>Messing expenditure incurred for constituents was treated as expenditure in the nature of entertainment expenditure under section 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Applying the binding Full Bench view that the expression covers even modest or frugal expenditure, the court held that such spending fell within the statutory prohibition. The disallowance was therefore justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:26:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 116 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22920</link>
      <description>Messing expenditure incurred for constituents was treated as expenditure in the nature of entertainment expenditure under section 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Applying the binding Full Bench view that the expression covers even modest or frugal expenditure, the court held that such spending fell within the statutory prohibition. The disallowance was therefore justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>