<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 101 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397158</link>
    <description>The High Court found in favor of the petitioner, ruling that the premature issuance of the assessment order before the scheduled hearing date violated principles of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside, and a fresh personal hearing was directed to be conducted via video conferencing. The Court emphasized the necessity of procedural fairness and adherence to natural justice principles in the assessment process under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 101 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397158</link>
      <description>The High Court found in favor of the petitioner, ruling that the premature issuance of the assessment order before the scheduled hearing date violated principles of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside, and a fresh personal hearing was directed to be conducted via video conferencing. The Court emphasized the necessity of procedural fairness and adherence to natural justice principles in the assessment process under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>