<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1948 (10) TMI 16 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289556</link>
    <description>A provincial labour relations board with administrative and quasi-judicial powers, including certification of bargaining units, recognition of unions, reinstatement orders and monetary relief, was examined for compatibility with section 96 of the British North America Act, 1867. The governing test was whether the board&#039;s jurisdiction and institutional character made it analogous to a superior, district or county court, not merely whether it exercised some judicial power. Because its subject-matter, composition, appointment structure, representative character and policy-driven functions differed materially from those courts, enforceable orders and limited review did not place it within the protected constitutional class.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 15:25:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1948 (10) TMI 16 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289556</link>
      <description>A provincial labour relations board with administrative and quasi-judicial powers, including certification of bargaining units, recognition of unions, reinstatement orders and monetary relief, was examined for compatibility with section 96 of the British North America Act, 1867. The governing test was whether the board&#039;s jurisdiction and institutional character made it analogous to a superior, district or county court, not merely whether it exercised some judicial power. Because its subject-matter, composition, appointment structure, representative character and policy-driven functions differed materially from those courts, enforceable orders and limited review did not place it within the protected constitutional class.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>