<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 85 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397142</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessees, directing the deletion of additions made by the tax authorities. The ITAT found that the assessee adequately explained the sources of the deposits and concluded that the tax authorities&#039; determinations were based on suspicion, conjectures, and biases. The order was pronounced in the Open Court on 13th July 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 85 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397142</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessees, directing the deletion of additions made by the tax authorities. The ITAT found that the assessee adequately explained the sources of the deposits and concluded that the tax authorities&#039; determinations were based on suspicion, conjectures, and biases. The order was pronounced in the Open Court on 13th July 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>