<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 82 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397139</link>
    <description>Representations seeking amendment or rectification of a classification made in a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 were required to be considered by the competent authority. The Delhi High Court did not decide the petitioner&#039;s substantive entitlement under the Scheme, but directed the respondent to examine and decide the pending requests after granting an opportunity of hearing and to act within the stipulated time in accordance with law. The rights and contentions of both sides were expressly left open, and the matter was not finally determined on the merits of the claimed rectification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:18:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 82 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397139</link>
      <description>Representations seeking amendment or rectification of a classification made in a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 were required to be considered by the competent authority. The Delhi High Court did not decide the petitioner&#039;s substantive entitlement under the Scheme, but directed the respondent to examine and decide the pending requests after granting an opportunity of hearing and to act within the stipulated time in accordance with law. The rights and contentions of both sides were expressly left open, and the matter was not finally determined on the merits of the claimed rectification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>