https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397137 The Tribunal held that the Appellant Bank was not liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism as it was not considered the recipient of the service provided by the Foreign Bank. The order passed by the Commissioner demanding service tax was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant Bank. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 May 2021 11:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397137 The Tribunal held that the Appellant Bank was not liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism as it was not considered the recipient of the service provided by the Foreign Bank. The order passed by the Commissioner demanding service tax was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant Bank. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397137