<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1196 - ITAT Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application for rectification, recalling its previous order and scheduling a fresh hearing based on contradictory decisions and the Hon&#039;ble High Court&#039;s clarification. The apparent mistake in dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal was rectified under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the importance of aligning decisions with current legal interpretations for just outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 06:53:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1196 - ITAT Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application for rectification, recalling its previous order and scheduling a fresh hearing based on contradictory decisions and the Hon&#039;ble High Court&#039;s clarification. The apparent mistake in dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal was rectified under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the importance of aligning decisions with current legal interpretations for just outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>