<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1947 (4) TMI 19 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289539</link>
    <description>A formal requirement that an emergency control order be expressed as made by the Governor-General in Council was treated as directory, so the order remained valid where the substance of governmental action was otherwise clear. The business rules were read broadly enough to permit delegation for convenient transaction of executive business, so the challenge based on action by a single member failed. Saving provisions were construed to preserve the Special Tribunal&#039;s constitution, pending prosecutions, accrued liabilities, and prior operation of the emergency legislation after repeal or expiry, so the proceedings could continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 17:34:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1947 (4) TMI 19 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289539</link>
      <description>A formal requirement that an emergency control order be expressed as made by the Governor-General in Council was treated as directory, so the order remained valid where the substance of governmental action was otherwise clear. The business rules were read broadly enough to permit delegation for convenient transaction of executive business, so the challenge based on action by a single member failed. Saving provisions were construed to preserve the Special Tribunal&#039;s constitution, pending prosecutions, accrued liabilities, and prior operation of the emergency legislation after repeal or expiry, so the proceedings could continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>