<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 697 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289532</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the notice issued under section 158BD after the completion of the block assessment of the searched person was invalid. The satisfaction for initiating proceedings was recorded after the statutory time period, rendering the proceedings void. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of recording satisfaction before initiating proceedings under section 158BD. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the invalidity of the notice and assessment order, with the assessee&#039;s cross-objection also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:25:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 697 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289532</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the notice issued under section 158BD after the completion of the block assessment of the searched person was invalid. The satisfaction for initiating proceedings was recorded after the statutory time period, rendering the proceedings void. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of recording satisfaction before initiating proceedings under section 158BD. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the invalidity of the notice and assessment order, with the assessee&#039;s cross-objection also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>