https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289530 Bonus, once paid, was treated as part of wages for attachment purposes under the proviso to Section 60(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the contrary view taken by the court below was not sustainable. The Court preferred the later view that paid bonus bears the true attribute of wages and can therefore be attached. The separate factual question whether the respondent was a mechanic or a labourer was left undecided because the lower court record contained no material on that issue. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Aug 2020 10:28:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289530 Bonus, once paid, was treated as part of wages for attachment purposes under the proviso to Section 60(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the contrary view taken by the court below was not sustainable. The Court preferred the later view that paid bonus bears the true attribute of wages and can therefore be attached. The separate factual question whether the respondent was a mechanic or a labourer was left undecided because the lower court record contained no material on that issue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289530