https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289528 Bonus payable to a workman was treated as having the character of wages once payable, so it was protected from attachment in execution under Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 was held applicable to the establishments concerned, and Section 1(4) was read as operating for the accounting year commencing in 1964 and subsequent years to that extent. On that basis, the objection to attachment succeeded and the bonus was not liable to attachment. en-us Fri, 02 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Aug 2020 10:16:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289528 Bonus payable to a workman was treated as having the character of wages once payable, so it was protected from attachment in execution under Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 was held applicable to the establishments concerned, and Section 1(4) was read as operating for the accounting year commencing in 1964 and subsequent years to that extent. On that basis, the objection to attachment succeeded and the bonus was not liable to attachment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289528