<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 114 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22908</link>
    <description>Interest levied under section 215 of the Income-tax Act was treated as part of the assessment process, so a standalone appeal confined only to interest was not maintainable. However, where the assessee had already appealed against the assessment on merits, the levy of interest could also be challenged in that appeal. Applying binding Supreme Court authority, the Court answered the referred question in the affirmative and held the appeal against interest entertainable in those circumstances, in favour of the assessee and against the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 114 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22908</link>
      <description>Interest levied under section 215 of the Income-tax Act was treated as part of the assessment process, so a standalone appeal confined only to interest was not maintainable. However, where the assessee had already appealed against the assessment on merits, the levy of interest could also be challenged in that appeal. Applying binding Supreme Court authority, the Court answered the referred question in the affirmative and held the appeal against interest entertainable in those circumstances, in favour of the assessee and against the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>