<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 63 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397120</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the AO&#039;s classification of compensation as &quot;income from house property&quot; and validating the re-opening of the assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found no merit in the other grounds, deeming them vague or premature. The Tribunal also addressed procedural delays due to COVID-19, excluding the lockdown period from the 90-day pronouncement requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 63 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397120</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the AO&#039;s classification of compensation as &quot;income from house property&quot; and validating the re-opening of the assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found no merit in the other grounds, deeming them vague or premature. The Tribunal also addressed procedural delays due to COVID-19, excluding the lockdown period from the 90-day pronouncement requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>