<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1909 (1) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289520</link>
    <description>Marine policy stipulations printed on the contract were treated as conditions precedent, so the assured had to prove strict compliance with the no-smoking or no-cooking prohibition and prompt police reporting unless a waiver was established. The contemporaneous fire report and the delayed police intimation did not satisfactorily show compliance, and waiver was not proved beyond a limited request for examination of the Manji. The policy&#039;s six-month suit limitation was also enforced, with &quot;month&quot; construed according to the contract&#039;s governing meaning in the absence of a contrary indication. On both grounds, recovery under the policy was defeated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 1909 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1909 (1) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289520</link>
      <description>Marine policy stipulations printed on the contract were treated as conditions precedent, so the assured had to prove strict compliance with the no-smoking or no-cooking prohibition and prompt police reporting unless a waiver was established. The contemporaneous fire report and the delayed police intimation did not satisfactorily show compliance, and waiver was not proved beyond a limited request for examination of the Manji. The policy&#039;s six-month suit limitation was also enforced, with &quot;month&quot; construed according to the contract&#039;s governing meaning in the absence of a contrary indication. On both grounds, recovery under the policy was defeated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 1909 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>