<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>S.40 (a) (ia) r.w.s 194C - SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT COMPANY (SC) – COUNSELS MISSED TO POINT OUT THAT NO SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW WERE FRAMED BY HIGH COURT and did not request for restoration of appeal to High Court- a fit case for review.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9399</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan High Court summarily dismissed an appeal from the Appellate Tribunal without formulating or answering the Substantial Questions of Law presented in the memorandum of appeal, and the Supreme Court proceeded to decide issues on facts and law despite that absence; the author contends this is noncompliant with the statutory appellate procedure and established jurisprudence and argues the matter was fit for restoration to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 08:37:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 08:37:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>S.40 (a) (ia) r.w.s 194C - SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT COMPANY (SC) – COUNSELS MISSED TO POINT OUT THAT NO SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW WERE FRAMED BY HIGH COURT and did not request for restoration of appeal to High Court- a fit case for review.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9399</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan High Court summarily dismissed an appeal from the Appellate Tribunal without formulating or answering the Substantial Questions of Law presented in the memorandum of appeal, and the Supreme Court proceeded to decide issues on facts and law despite that absence; the author contends this is noncompliant with the statutory appellate procedure and established jurisprudence and argues the matter was fit for restoration to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 08:37:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>