<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1878 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289518</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by reducing the estimated additions made by the Income Tax Officer against alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal considered the nature of the business and the failure to substantiate delivery of material, ultimately reducing the additions to 2% of the alleged bogus purchases. The balance addition was deleted, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2020 20:13:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1878 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289518</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by reducing the estimated additions made by the Income Tax Officer against alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal considered the nature of the business and the failure to substantiate delivery of material, ultimately reducing the additions to 2% of the alleged bogus purchases. The balance addition was deleted, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>