<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 53 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397110</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner to deposit the principal profiteered sum within two weeks, with further proceedings stayed upon deposit. The matter was listed for a future date along with related cases. The order was to be uploaded on the website and forwarded to the counsels via email. An application by one of the respondents for marking attendance in the order was allowed, leading to the modification of the order dated 28th July, 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:27:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 53 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397110</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner to deposit the principal profiteered sum within two weeks, with further proceedings stayed upon deposit. The matter was listed for a future date along with related cases. The order was to be uploaded on the website and forwarded to the counsels via email. An application by one of the respondents for marking attendance in the order was allowed, leading to the modification of the order dated 28th July, 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>