<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 44 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397101</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the High Court, the Adjudicating Authority, and the Appellate Tribunal. The penalty imposed on the appellant was also set aside as there was no finding that the appellant was responsible for the conduct of the business of the company at the relevant time, and the evidence supporting his claim was not adequately considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 44 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397101</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the High Court, the Adjudicating Authority, and the Appellate Tribunal. The penalty imposed on the appellant was also set aside as there was no finding that the appellant was responsible for the conduct of the business of the company at the relevant time, and the evidence supporting his claim was not adequately considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>