<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 109 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22900</link>
    <description>The court clarified that rule ID of the Wealth-tax Rules does not override section 24(6) of the Wealth-tax Act. It allowed the Revenue to rely on rule ID even if not argued before the Tribunal. The court did not question the Tribunal&#039;s adoption of the valuers&#039; valuation method and emphasized the importance of timely objections during legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:22:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 109 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22900</link>
      <description>The court clarified that rule ID of the Wealth-tax Rules does not override section 24(6) of the Wealth-tax Act. It allowed the Revenue to rely on rule ID even if not argued before the Tribunal. The court did not question the Tribunal&#039;s adoption of the valuers&#039; valuation method and emphasized the importance of timely objections during legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>