<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 40 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397097</link>
    <description>Bail was granted in a GST prosecution involving alleged clandestine manufacture and supply of pan masala without payment of tax, after the Court considered the nature and gravity of the economic offence, the material collected in searches and seizures, and the stage of investigation. The Court accepted that further custody was not necessary on the facts before it and allowed relief without expressing any view on the merits of the prosecution case, subject to conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 40 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397097</link>
      <description>Bail was granted in a GST prosecution involving alleged clandestine manufacture and supply of pan masala without payment of tax, after the Court considered the nature and gravity of the economic offence, the material collected in searches and seizures, and the stage of investigation. The Court accepted that further custody was not necessary on the facts before it and allowed relief without expressing any view on the merits of the prosecution case, subject to conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>