https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397096 The court upheld the detention of vehicles and goods due to the non-production of an e-way bill for the first leg of the journey. However, the petitioner was allowed to secure release by furnishing a bank guarantee for the demanded amount. The court directed the respondent to release the vehicles and goods upon receipt of the bank guarantee and proceed with adjudication under Section 130 of the GST Act to address objections regarding tax and penalty imposition. This decision promotes a fair resolution process and emphasizes compliance with legal procedures outlined in the GST Act. en-us Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Aug 2020 14:56:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397096 The court upheld the detention of vehicles and goods due to the non-production of an e-way bill for the first leg of the journey. However, the petitioner was allowed to secure release by furnishing a bank guarantee for the demanded amount. The court directed the respondent to release the vehicles and goods upon receipt of the bank guarantee and proceed with adjudication under Section 130 of the GST Act to address objections regarding tax and penalty imposition. This decision promotes a fair resolution process and emphasizes compliance with legal procedures outlined in the GST Act. Case-Laws GST Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397096