<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 28 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397085</link>
    <description>The court held that under Section 62 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, the assessing officer can proceed with best judgment assessment immediately upon detecting failure to file returns, with a five-year time limit from the date specified under Section 44 for annual returns. Rejecting the petitioner&#039;s argument that assessment should start after December of the financial year, the court clarified that the five-year limit is the maximum duration for assessment, not a specific starting point. As the petitioner did not file valid returns within 30 days of assessment orders, the challenge against the orders was dismissed. Recovery proceedings were stayed for six weeks to allow the petitioner to appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2020 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 28 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397085</link>
      <description>The court held that under Section 62 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, the assessing officer can proceed with best judgment assessment immediately upon detecting failure to file returns, with a five-year time limit from the date specified under Section 44 for annual returns. Rejecting the petitioner&#039;s argument that assessment should start after December of the financial year, the court clarified that the five-year limit is the maximum duration for assessment, not a specific starting point. As the petitioner did not file valid returns within 30 days of assessment orders, the challenge against the orders was dismissed. Recovery proceedings were stayed for six weeks to allow the petitioner to appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>