https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289491 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the Order-in-Original. It held that the Appellant was entitled to Cenvat Credit of Sugar Cess based on relevant legal precedents, including a decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that there was no time limit for recrediting the amount reversed under protest, in line with Circular No. 990/14/2014-CX-8. The appeal succeeded, and the impugned order was set aside, providing the Appellant with consequential relief. en-us Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Aug 2020 14:24:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289491 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the Order-in-Original. It held that the Appellant was entitled to Cenvat Credit of Sugar Cess based on relevant legal precedents, including a decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that there was no time limit for recrediting the amount reversed under protest, in line with Circular No. 990/14/2014-CX-8. The appeal succeeded, and the impugned order was set aside, providing the Appellant with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289491