<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1573 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289495</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed all appeals filed by the Revenue, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decisions. It held that the assessee qualifies as a developer under Section 80-IA(4), the reliance on specific judgments was appropriate, the interpretation of provisions was correct, and the loss on Quota written off was rightly treated as revenue expenditure. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all legal issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 14:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1573 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289495</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed all appeals filed by the Revenue, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decisions. It held that the assessee qualifies as a developer under Section 80-IA(4), the reliance on specific judgments was appropriate, the interpretation of provisions was correct, and the loss on Quota written off was rightly treated as revenue expenditure. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all legal issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>