<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (1) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289483</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the tax deduction obligation on the company. The Court held that the company&#039;s liability to deduct tax under section 18(3B) was not dependent on a formal determination of their status as agents under section 43. As the company failed to establish their agent status, they were unable to avoid the tax deduction obligation as required by the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2020 18:34:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (1) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289483</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the tax deduction obligation on the company. The Court held that the company&#039;s liability to deduct tax under section 18(3B) was not dependent on a formal determination of their status as agents under section 43. As the company failed to establish their agent status, they were unable to avoid the tax deduction obligation as required by the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>