https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289481 The court held that it had jurisdiction to try the suit for a declaration of title to the property claimed by the plaintiff, as the suit did not concern revenue matters. Additionally, the court concluded that Article 225 of the Constitution removed the restriction on the High Court's jurisdiction in revenue matters, and this provision applied retrospectively to the present suit. en-us Fri, 08 Jan 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Aug 2020 16:07:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289481 The court held that it had jurisdiction to try the suit for a declaration of title to the property claimed by the plaintiff, as the suit did not concern revenue matters. Additionally, the court concluded that Article 225 of the Constitution removed the restriction on the High Court's jurisdiction in revenue matters, and this provision applied retrospectively to the present suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Jan 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289481