https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289480 A document referring to execution of a regular lease and using the expression "subject to" was treated as a preliminary arrangement rather than a final bargain, because its terms were too uncertain to be reduced into a formal lease without further assent. On that reasoning, the instrument was not a concluded and enforceable agreement capable of specific performance, as the parties had not yet reached binding consensus on all essential terms. The source text states that specific performance could not be ordered and that the appeal succeeded while the suit was dismissed. en-us Fri, 03 Mar 1922 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Aug 2020 16:05:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289480 A document referring to execution of a regular lease and using the expression "subject to" was treated as a preliminary arrangement rather than a final bargain, because its terms were too uncertain to be reduced into a formal lease without further assent. On that reasoning, the instrument was not a concluded and enforceable agreement capable of specific performance, as the parties had not yet reached binding consensus on all essential terms. The source text states that specific performance could not be ordered and that the appeal succeeded while the suit was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Mar 1922 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289480