<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (11) TMI 34 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289479</link>
    <description>The court held that the application for revision could not be granted by the High Court due to the amendment, which vested the power of revision in the District Judge. The court dismissed the application, with no orders about costs. The judgment was concurred by both judges, M.C. Desai and Mirza Nasir Ullah Beg.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2020 15:54:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (11) TMI 34 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289479</link>
      <description>The court held that the application for revision could not be granted by the High Court due to the amendment, which vested the power of revision in the District Judge. The court dismissed the application, with no orders about costs. The judgment was concurred by both judges, M.C. Desai and Mirza Nasir Ullah Beg.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>