https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289478 Section 2(c) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was construed as preserving pre-existing rights, liabilities and relief, but not the procedural machinery used to enforce them. The distinction between a mortgagor's substantive right to redeem and the remedy or mode of redemption was treated as decisive, and a change in the time and mode of redemption was held not to alter the underlying right or liability. The new Act therefore applied to the pending mortgage matter, and the earlier procedural regime was not saved. en-us Tue, 23 Mar 1886 00:00:00 +0521 Sat, 01 Aug 2020 15:50:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289478 Section 2(c) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was construed as preserving pre-existing rights, liabilities and relief, but not the procedural machinery used to enforce them. The distinction between a mortgagor's substantive right to redeem and the remedy or mode of redemption was treated as decisive, and a change in the time and mode of redemption was held not to alter the underlying right or liability. The new Act therefore applied to the pending mortgage matter, and the earlier procedural regime was not saved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Mar 1886 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289478