https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289478 The judgment concerns the interpretation of Section 2(c) of the Transfer of Property Act. Justices Garth, Wilson, and Trevelyan, among others, analyze the application of this section to a specific case. While there were initial doubts and differing views, the majority ultimately aligns in favor of applying the Transfer of Property Act provisions, emphasizing the importance of not impeding vested rights. The judges consider the impact on mortgagor rights and relief under both the Regulation and the Act, concluding that the relief remains unaffected by procedural changes. Justice Trevelyan stresses the potential inconvenience of a contrary decision. en-us Tue, 23 Mar 1886 00:00:00 +0521 Sat, 01 Aug 2020 15:50:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289478 The judgment concerns the interpretation of Section 2(c) of the Transfer of Property Act. Justices Garth, Wilson, and Trevelyan, among others, analyze the application of this section to a specific case. While there were initial doubts and differing views, the majority ultimately aligns in favor of applying the Transfer of Property Act provisions, emphasizing the importance of not impeding vested rights. The judges consider the impact on mortgagor rights and relief under both the Regulation and the Act, concluding that the relief remains unaffected by procedural changes. Justice Trevelyan stresses the potential inconvenience of a contrary decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Mar 1886 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289478