https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397058 The Hon'ble Member (Judicial) allowed the appeal, granting the appellant cenvat credit on various services utilized in the factory of production. The Member found that the disputed services were directly or indirectly related to the manufacturing process and fell within the ambit of Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was entitled to cenvat credit on all the input services in dispute, emphasizing their connection to manufacturing activities and compliance requirements. en-us Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397058 The Hon'ble Member (Judicial) allowed the appeal, granting the appellant cenvat credit on various services utilized in the factory of production. The Member found that the disputed services were directly or indirectly related to the manufacturing process and fell within the ambit of Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was entitled to cenvat credit on all the input services in dispute, emphasizing their connection to manufacturing activities and compliance requirements. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397058