<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1448 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289466</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the AO&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT agreed that short deduction of tax at source, due to differing interpretations of TDS provisions, does not justify disallowance. The ruling clarified the correct application of section 40(a)(ia) in such cases, emphasizing accurate compliance with TDS provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1448 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289466</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the AO&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT agreed that short deduction of tax at source, due to differing interpretations of TDS provisions, does not justify disallowance. The ruling clarified the correct application of section 40(a)(ia) in such cases, emphasizing accurate compliance with TDS provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>