<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 723 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397054</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeals due to low tax effect but left substantial legal questions open for further consideration. The Court upheld the interpretation of the circular on the threshold limit for filing appeals by the Revenue. It granted the Revenue the liberty to seek restoration of appeals for hearing on merits if the tax effect surpasses the prescribed threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 723 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397054</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeals due to low tax effect but left substantial legal questions open for further consideration. The Court upheld the interpretation of the circular on the threshold limit for filing appeals by the Revenue. It granted the Revenue the liberty to seek restoration of appeals for hearing on merits if the tax effect surpasses the prescribed threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>