<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 714 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397045</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount of Rs. 25,00,000 received could not be taxed as capital gains due to the absence of cost of acquisition and the nature of the receipt as consideration for not interfering with the possession of the property. The appeal was allowed, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 714 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397045</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount of Rs. 25,00,000 received could not be taxed as capital gains due to the absence of cost of acquisition and the nature of the receipt as consideration for not interfering with the possession of the property. The appeal was allowed, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>