<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 710 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397041</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, and ordered the exclusion of interest income from partnership firms from the total income for AY 2015-16. The income had already been taxed for AY 2014-15, preventing double taxation. The Tribunal emphasized the AO&#039;s duty to assess correctly and rectify mistakes in income declaration, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal based on the non-revised return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 710 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397041</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, and ordered the exclusion of interest income from partnership firms from the total income for AY 2015-16. The income had already been taxed for AY 2014-15, preventing double taxation. The Tribunal emphasized the AO&#039;s duty to assess correctly and rectify mistakes in income declaration, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal based on the non-revised return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>