<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 705 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397036</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, granting the appellant the right to cross-examine witnesses during adjudication proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cross-examination for natural justice and the defendant&#039;s defense, highlighting that evidence can only be admitted when witnesses are cross-examined. The Tribunal referred to Section 138B of the Customs Act and concluded that the appellant should be allowed to cross-examine witnesses, excluding the Senior Intelligence Officer as part of the investigation. The judgment upheld the principles of natural justice and the defendant&#039;s right to a fair adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:11:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 705 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397036</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, granting the appellant the right to cross-examine witnesses during adjudication proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cross-examination for natural justice and the defendant&#039;s defense, highlighting that evidence can only be admitted when witnesses are cross-examined. The Tribunal referred to Section 138B of the Customs Act and concluded that the appellant should be allowed to cross-examine witnesses, excluding the Senior Intelligence Officer as part of the investigation. The judgment upheld the principles of natural justice and the defendant&#039;s right to a fair adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>