https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397032 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax for construction activities or under the reverse charge mechanism due to insufficient evidence and failure to meet legal requirements. The appellant successfully argued that their activities did not constitute taxable services and were exempted under specific notifications, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the service tax demands imposed by the revenue authorities. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:30:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397032 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax for construction activities or under the reverse charge mechanism due to insufficient evidence and failure to meet legal requirements. The appellant successfully argued that their activities did not constitute taxable services and were exempted under specific notifications, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the service tax demands imposed by the revenue authorities. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397032