<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1530 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289440</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the amount received by the assessee company from its subsidiary was not deemed dividend but a business transaction. The ITAT remitted the issues of diminution in value of investments, administrative and interest expenses, and write-off of investments and advances back to the Assessing Officer for further examination, emphasizing the importance of thorough financial analysis and verification of facts in these matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:43:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1530 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289440</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the amount received by the assessee company from its subsidiary was not deemed dividend but a business transaction. The ITAT remitted the issues of diminution in value of investments, administrative and interest expenses, and write-off of investments and advances back to the Assessing Officer for further examination, emphasizing the importance of thorough financial analysis and verification of facts in these matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>