<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1358 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289450</link>
    <description>Ms. Justice Reva Khetrapal (Retd.) was relieved as Administrator after expressing inability to continue, and Mr. Justice Anil Kumar (Retd.) was appointed in her place on the same terms and conditions as the original appointment. The operative appointment order dated 14 January 2015 was to remain available to the successor Administrator. The Registry was directed to furnish a copy of that order and a digital copy of the entire record within four days, and the former Administrator was directed to forward any remaining records to her successor. The parties were permitted to appear before the new Administrator for a preliminary hearing, and the matter was listed for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:43:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1358 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289450</link>
      <description>Ms. Justice Reva Khetrapal (Retd.) was relieved as Administrator after expressing inability to continue, and Mr. Justice Anil Kumar (Retd.) was appointed in her place on the same terms and conditions as the original appointment. The operative appointment order dated 14 January 2015 was to remain available to the successor Administrator. The Registry was directed to furnish a copy of that order and a digital copy of the entire record within four days, and the former Administrator was directed to forward any remaining records to her successor. The parties were permitted to appear before the new Administrator for a preliminary hearing, and the matter was listed for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>