https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289449 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order demanding Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty for the alleged suppression of LABSA production. The Tribunal found the Revenue's disputes regarding production percentages to be artificial, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence supporting allegations of clandestine removal. Due to the absence of conclusive proof, the Tribunal dismissed the claims and provided relief to the appellant, stressing the necessity of substantial evidence in cases of clandestine removal. en-us Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:43:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289449 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order demanding Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty for the alleged suppression of LABSA production. The Tribunal found the Revenue's disputes regarding production percentages to be artificial, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence supporting allegations of clandestine removal. Due to the absence of conclusive proof, the Tribunal dismissed the claims and provided relief to the appellant, stressing the necessity of substantial evidence in cases of clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289449